[Mumbai: Police, police officials blame ‘fake’ news story for violence in city]

The violence in Mumbai on Saturday came as the city’s police commissioner blamed “fake” news stories on Facebook.

The violence erupted after a man who police said was armed with a knife was allegedly attacked by an unidentified person.

The man, identified as Subhash Kapoor, died at a hospital.

In a statement, Mumbai police commissioner Satyendra Singh said that the man was “a regular” on Facebook who was a member of a community called “Krishna” and that he had been targeted “for the last few days.”

“We will never tolerate such kind of attacks, especially against people of a different religion and community,” Singh said.

“We have received calls from all communities.

We will continue to do so, but at the same time we will not tolerate this kind of violence.”

He added that “there will be consequences.”

Police did not immediately identify the attacker.

According to the Indian Express, police arrested Kapoor on Saturday after he allegedly attacked an unidentified man on the outskirts of Mumbai.

Police said Kapoor was identified as the man who was attacked on Saturday and was being held in custody.

Police Commissioner Satyendras Singh said in a statement that the alleged attacker “had been identified by his Facebook profile as a member from the community named ‘Krishnamaji’ who was living in the area of Parel and also called ‘Kumar’ on social media.”

Police said the incident began when the victim was attacked by Kapoor and two unidentified people.

Police initially said that two people had been arrested for the alleged attack.

Police have not identified the two suspects.

The Indian Express quoted the commissioner as saying that Kapoor had been living in Parel for a few days and that his Facebook page was “frequent” among people from that area.

“I have asked my staff to search his Facebook and Facebook accounts for anyone who has information that could be used to identify the accused and bring him to justice,” he said.

Police later clarified that the person who attacked Kapoor belonged to a “community called ‘Parel’ who lived in the village of Prahladipura in the same area,” and that Kapuras Facebook page contained “some information about his identity.”

The Indian Business Times reported that Kapouras Facebook profile included photos of him wearing a white shirt and dark pants, a belt, and a hat with a crown on it.

“Kumar is a local person who was resident in the Parel area,” the commissioner said.

Kapur has not been identified.

The commissioner also said that Kapunas Facebook account contained “information about him which has been circulating for the last two months.”

The commissioner said the two “were seen talking to each other in the vicinity of the victim on Friday night and Saturday morning,” and claimed that they were not together “at all” on Friday.

“At the time of the incident, we have not received any calls from the area around the victim, who is believed to be in his home.

The police are trying to trace them,” the Indian Business Journal reported.

According a local newspaper, Kapur’s Facebook profile also contained “pictures of him eating food,” “picture of him sitting on a chair with his legs crossed,” and “picturing him playing cards.”

“Kapur is a regular on Facebook, and I am sure his friends know his whereabouts,” one of his friends told the Indian Daily Times.

Kapoor’s Facebook page also contained images of him holding a gun, a backpack, and his phone.

“When he was attacked, he was not carrying a gun,” a friend told the newspaper.

“He had a bag of food in his hand, and he had his phone in his lap.

I can’t imagine how he felt when he was hit.

It was a big shock for him,” he added.

The Hindu reported that the police are looking into whether the man’s identity can be traced.

According the Hindustan Times, “Police have also identified three men who are in custody in connection with the incident.

A fourth man is still in custody and could not be contacted for comment.”

The Hindu also reported that there is a “high-profile case” in the city, but it was not clear whether it would lead to charges.

“Police said that there has been no evidence that any of the men have any links with terror organizations,” the Hindu reported.

A Facebook page associated with Kapur had previously been set up by someone calling himself “Dabha” and posted photographs of him with a gun.

According for the page, Kapoor is a farmer and “has a very good social life.”

Police also confirmed that there were two other people involved in the attack, but that it was unclear if they were related to the victims.

The incident comes as the country continues to grapple with a spate of hate crimes.

On Friday, a Muslim man was beaten to death by a Hindu mob

How do you find out what’s real and what’s fake on the internet?

The term “fake” is a catch-all term for anything that doesn’t match reality.

And the truth is, we don’t have the same level of accuracy as we did when people were still using newspapers and the like to search for things they’d been told were true.

But as the technology and infrastructure changes over the years, it’s now possible to find out if something is real or not.

The internet’s fake news ecosystem has been growing exponentially over the last few years, with fake news websites becoming increasingly popular.

This infographic, created by The Daily Dot, shows just how many fake news sites exist on the web today.

It shows that there are around 1,000,000 sites, and only about 30% of them are actually trustworthy.

Here’s what we know so far about fake news and fake news content.

What are the biggest problems in the fake news world?

The biggest problems are twofold: the people who run these sites, or their algorithms.

And then there’s the fact that these sites often don’t take into account what the actual truth is.

We know this because of a number of things, like the way the algorithms that make up the fake content are programmed.

If we’re really interested in a particular piece of content, we can often use the site’s algorithms to figure out what the most-watched article on the site is.

And when we do this, we often find that most of the stories we want to believe are just as real as the stories that aren’t.

But the fake stories on these sites aren’t just a byproduct of the algorithms.

They’re designed to mislead.

Fake news sites have a problem with accuracy and fact checking.

This is because they often do things that are very different from what they claim to do.

They often publish stories that are incorrect or misleading in nature, such as things like fake photos and claims of conspiracy theories.

And sometimes they claim that the stories they publish are the real deal.

For example, one of the most notorious sites that has made headlines for its fake news is the Daily Dot.

It publishes news from the likes of the Daily Mail, The Telegraph, and Breitbart, all of which are often seen as fake news.

And they’re all very much part of the fake “fake news” ecosystem.

The Daily Dot has been accused of spreading “fake content,” but there’s no evidence that they actually do this.

Instead, the Daily Domain is part of an automated system that does what is known as fact checking, and in doing so, it also checks the articles that it publishes against its own algorithms.

Fake news is also a problem because it can mislead users into thinking that the article they’re reading is real.

And as fake articles are published all over the internet, users often don.

They can also mislead users by publishing articles that are misleading or that are clearly fake.

These types of issues are the reason why the fake-news community is so vocal.

Fake news has been around for a long time, and it’s one of many reasons why so many people are skeptical about its validity.

And with so many fake-related news sites popping up, the internet’s real estate market is going to be full of sites like this one.

This infographic shows how fake news can be spread.

This infographic also shows how a lot of fake news stories are actually real.

This is the image that the Daily News published after a story about a man who was accused of raping a woman in California.

It wasn’t exactly fake news, and this is why it was taken down.

This graphic shows how real news outlets have reacted to the claims that a Trump administration official is trying to take away health insurance from millions of people.

The fake news outlet that published this story, the Associated Press, responded by calling the story “fraudulent” and saying that the person who posted it had been trying to “take away people’s health insurance.”

The Trump administration then quickly deleted the story from the AP website.

This was the screenshot from a fake news article published on a website called Infowars.

The article claimed that President Trump is considering to cut off health insurance to millions of Americans, claiming that the plan would be “bought and paid for.”

This article is about how the fake information spread on Reddit.

Reddit, a popular forum for the sharing of news, has become a hub for the spread of fake information.

The Reddit community is known for its wide-ranging community of readers, who often post posts from other users who are either trying to spread the misinformation, or simply to share their own thoughts.

But a number have also started publishing stories on Reddit that aren’t even from Reddit.

These fake stories are often shared on subreddits like r/pics, r/politics, and r/food.

Many of these posts are fake news articles that have been picked up by other users on Reddit who aren’t actually from