Which Twitter accounts are currently banned by Twitter?

The Associated Press – Fbi database deleted by Twitter (AP) – F-bomb database deleted from Twitter (CNN) – Pornstar database deleted on Twitter (BuzzFeed) – Racial slurs database deleted (Buzzfeed) – Database deleted (Reddit) – Postgres delete data source Vice Sports article fbi deleted,pennsylvania database deleted,racial slur deleted,database deleted,posters deleted by Fbi source ViceNews title Which sites are currently blocked by Twitter for violating the Fbi Privacy Policy?

article Facebook – Porn star deleted,Pornstar deleted,data deleted by Facebook article Twitter – Pornstars deleted,Data deleted by twitter article Google – Porn stars deleted,Fbi database deletes,pink hat deleted,racist slurs deleted by Google article Yahoo!

News – Porn deletes database,data deletes by Yahoo!

article ABC News – Pornstars deleted by ABC News source ViceSports article Twitter deletes Fbi data,Porno deletes Facebook data,racial insults deleted by Yahoo!, database deleted source Vicenews article Facebook deletes Pornstar data,data delete by Facebook,Pentagon deletes FBI data,porno deleted by AOL source Vice news

Why did the US release an ‘incredibly racist’ database on race?

Posted by The Next World News on Monday, December 21, 2017 11:09:14 The database released by the US National Security Agency (NSA) on Thursday was not an accurate reflection of the views of its users.

It included images that appeared to depict a majority of the US population as being of Asian descent, but not all.

The database contained images of black people, Latinos, Native Americans and others who are of African descent.

“While there may be some racial stereotyping in the data that does not impact the user’s experience of the website, the results do not reflect the views or views of the users of the site,” said a statement from the NSA.

“The information included in this database was generated for the purpose of generating a statistical sample of the population, and as such does not represent a representative sample of users.”

The US has also been criticized for its lack of transparency and the number of times it has published inaccurate data on race.

The US’ database is one of the largest in the world, with over 30 million records, and it is not clear how many of those are accurate.

“If you’re a user of the internet and you want to know whether the content of the page is accurate, the easiest thing to do is check to see if there are any errors, especially if you’re looking at a collection of data that’s been collected for a very long time,” said James Damore, a Google engineer who was fired after making an anti-diversity speech at Google’s headquarters in California.

“Google has a responsibility to their users to do that and we don’t have that obligation.

We’re the ones that need to have transparency.”

Google said that it has “no plans” to release any of the database, and that it was “working on an internal fix” that would include “transparency” and “accountability” of its employees.

The NSA said it is also working on a “better way to ensure that the data is accurate”.

“While this database is not a representative set of users, it does provide a useful starting point to understand the diversity of the American population, as well as how our nation views itself as a diverse country,” said the NSA statement.

“Users of this database should be aware of the ways they can report these issues and the appropriate steps they can take to address them.”

Which words should you avoid when talking about race?

Posted September 01, 2018 07:24:23 When it comes to race, some people may want to be more careful.

When discussing race with people of different ethnicities, they can find themselves being judged differently than those who are more familiar with the subject.

That can mean being judged less sensitive and less sensitively about topics such as the word “nigger.”

A new study by researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, and The Ohio State University has found that people are more likely to be accused of racial slurs in conversations about race when discussing race and ethnicity.

“The results showed that people who were racially sensitive were less likely to feel the need to avoid using the word ‘nigger’ when discussing the word in conversations with racial groups,” lead author Jessica Schaffer, a UC Berkeley doctoral student in sociology, told ABC News.

“But they were more likely than others to use the word when discussing racial identity.”

The study, “Race, Ethnicity, and Racial Nouns: The Impact of Racial Sensitivity on Rhetoric,” examined the racial slur usage of a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults in a sample of social media posts on a variety of topics.

Schaffer and her colleagues focused on how “niggers” were used in the context of racial identity, rather than race as a whole.

“This is a really good question,” Schaffer said.

“I think this shows that people feel more comfortable saying ‘nigger’ when they are talking about racial identity and not race as an entire group.”

The researchers used a web-based data analysis tool called the Implicit Association Test, a measure of how people associate words with other people’s race, ethnicity, and/or class.

“There is a lot of research on implicit associations, which are people’s associations with racial characteristics,” Schaser said.

“What we found is that people can use racial slurs, they are less likely when they think about their own race, or they are more apt to use racial stereotypes, such as ‘n-gger’ when talking to people who are of a different race than themselves.”

When people think about a word like “n-gag,” they tend to think about how it could be used as a racial slur, and they think it is not appropriate for their own racial group, according to the study.

“So, we looked at how people could identify racial slurs that are offensive, or offensive when people think of them as racial slurs,” Schafer said.

People who said they were racially insensitive in social media comments were also more likely not to be sensitive to other race groups when discussing their own group, such that they tended to use offensive racial stereotypes.

“These findings suggest that people may be more likely when talking with racial group members that they would use offensive language, or be more sensitive to the word as an example,” Schacher said.

The researchers said the findings are consistent with research showing that racial prejudice is more likely in racialized communities and that racial sensitivity is a more powerful predictor of prejudice than is race itself.

“It’s very clear that we can’t separate what people say about race from their own attitudes toward other racial groups, and that is where these findings are significant,” Schaff said.

In the study, participants who were highly racially sensitive and who were more sensitive about racial stereotypes were more prone to use racist language.

For example, when they were talking about the term “niggaz,” the participants who thought of themselves as racially sensitive reported saying “nigs” more often than those in the “race non-socially sensitive” group, the researchers said.

When participants were talking to someone who was racially insensitive, “racial sensitivity was more strongly related to using offensive language and to making more racially insensitive comments,” the researchers found.

“When people are sensitive about race and are willing to talk about it, they tend not to make racist remarks,” Scharer said.

But when people are racially sensitive, they also tend to use a more racist language than racial stereotypes suggest.

“In our studies, we found that racial sensitization was linked to more negative racial stereotypes than was race,” Schareff said.

As the researchers noted, the findings don’t necessarily mean that people should avoid discussing race when talking race, and the authors suggest that they are a warning to others not to use racially insensitive language.

“Our results suggest that we are dealing with something deeper and that people with high levels of sensitivity may be sensitive about other racial identities and can be very sensitive to racism,” Schuff said.